Testing.
--
Chris Sharp
PINES System Administrator
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, Georgia 30345
(404) 235-7147
csh...@georgialibraries.org
http://pines.georgialibraries.org/
Hello all,
[NOTE: This message was sent yesterday, but I am told that list problems
prevented it from getting through, so this is a resend.]
The purpose of this email is to announce the official delay of the 2.5 release,
and to establish a new timeline for release. A number of factors are
Has anyone had success in printing spinals from Evergreen using an 8.5 x 11
inch (50 spinals per page) sheets of spinals. Specifically Bro Dart
laserink jet labels 55-395-014.
--
Mary Toma
Head Librarian
South Central Regional Library
160 Main Street
Box 1540
Winkler, MB R6W 4B4
204-325-5864
I know that folks have but I wasn't personally involved with the process so
I can't help, sorry.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Mary Toma scrlhead...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone had success in printing spinals from Evergreen using an 8.5 x
11 inch (50 spinals per page) sheets of spinals.
Hi Mary,
Will this help you: http://www.branchdistrictlibrary.org/professional/labels/?
Tina
Quoting Mary Toma scrlhead...@gmail.com:
Has anyone had success in printing spinals from Evergreen using an 8.5 x 11
inch (50 spinals per page) sheets of spinals. Specifically Bro Dart
laserink jet
Hi Brent,
The mention of parts and part holds makes me twitch!
When we first started implementing parts, like you, we had a mixture of
items with and without parts. The All Parts label for the title level hold
confused librarian and patron alike, leading them to think that the hold was
Hi All,
Implementing parts does have it's challenges, and it's not perfect yet, but we
feel it's a big step in the right direction.
Implementing parts affords the huge benefit that patrons are able to place their
own holds on materials like popular dvds, and actually get the part they want,
Hi Rogan,
The db work Command Prompt has done for KCLS is mostly configuration things,
work mem, max connections, etc. They have been fine tuning all those settings
to get the best performance. These settings wouldn't help other people as it
would be dependent on each libraries load. Another
Hi Scott,
I am curious about any improvement metrics you've seen from work you've done
and where it might be available to look at for replication. Joshua made some
pretty broad comments that sound really interesting and anything that improves
db performance is of great interest to me.
Excuse
P.S.
I hit send too soon. I really appreciate the response Scott. I look forward
to seeing some of the information you referenced and am glad to see that Jed at
KCLS was still committed to sharing. If it can be reasonably forward ported to
the community Evergreen is obviously what I am
Scott,
I echo Rogan's down-thread thanks for following up here.
I'm curious where the multi-threaded reingest project is shared. I
can't find anything like that searching any of the Evergreen the
mailing lists or launchpad for terms like ingest and multi.
Perhaps I'm just missing it. Some
Mike,
The multithreaded reingest project was shared during the hackathon at the last
evergreen conference.
Here is a link to what we ended up running for moving KCLS from 2.1 to 2.2.
https://github.com/CatalystIT/multithread_2_2_update
The files to pay attention to are the
12 matches
Mail list logo
