Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Bug squashing days

2014-08-01 Thread Kathy Lussier
Hi all, Unfortunately, it looks like I mistakenly added July dates to the poll instead of some of the August dates we were polling. I usually can edit a Doodle poll to fix these mistakes, but Doodle just isn't cooperating with me on this poll. Therefore, I had to create a new poll for bug sq

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 099 / 090 / 050

2014-08-01 Thread Yamil Suarez
Donald, We also use LC call numbers and to see the change you are talking about in the create volume, here is what we did. We made a change to the table "asset.call_number_class" in the column called "field" using SQL... from stock values of... select * from asset.call_number_class; id |

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 099 / 090 / 050

2014-08-01 Thread Rogan Hamby
Hi Donald, I'm not 100% sure what the question you're asking is and I hate to make some bad assumptions so I'll try to move this along by providing a little information with a caveat. My caveat is that I work for a public library and I know a lot of consortiums use a setup similar to ours but the

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] 099 / 090 / 050

2014-08-01 Thread Donald Butterworth
All, After a decent night's sleep, I reread the email I sent yesterday about LC call numbers and printing, and realized the 099 / 090 / 050 question has nothing to do with printing. (Duh) The question really has to do with what call number is supplied in the call number display when a new volume