[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Seeking development partners - improved support for cross references

2016-01-11 Thread Kathy Lussier
Hi all, MassLNC is planning to work with Equinox on a development project to improve support for cross references in the Evergreen browse search. The project will include the following components: * The use of the Metadata Authority Description Scheme (MADS) to extract and normalize authorit

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] jobs

2016-01-11 Thread McCanna, Terran
Thanks, Rogan. I'll confirm that the PINES position is still unfilled, and we are eager for applicants! Terran McCanna PINES Program Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 Atlanta, GA 30345 404-235-7138 tmcca...@georgialibraries.org - Original Messag

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] jobs

2016-01-11 Thread Rogan Hamby
Just a quick reminder that if you're looking for an Evergreen related job the web site under 'jobs' is a great place to go. https://evergreen-ils.org/jobs/ Aside from the existing positions I've just added one new one for a Junior Software Developer for the BC Libraries Cooperative and reactivate

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] When does the EG Academics group want to meet at the 2016 conference?

2016-01-11 Thread Yamil Suarez
Hello, The 2016 Evergreen conference organizers just asked me when would the academics group like to meet during the conference[1]. The conference takes place April 20-23, 2016. https://evergreen-ils.org/conference/eg16/ We could request to meet during a session slot (about 45 minutes) in the co

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Patrons can't place holds on Parts

2016-01-11 Thread Morgan, Michele
Hi, Placing part holds on checked out items is working fine on our 2.9 system. The Place Hold button is visible and we are able to place a part level hold on a checked out item without a problem. The library in question has the setting "Has Local Copy Block" set to True. If we attempt a part leve

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Patrons can't place holds on Parts

2016-01-11 Thread Dan Wells
Hello Rosie, I think you are right in that this scenario (block holds when available, allow holds for unavailable parts) is not supported by the current code. Unfortunately, I think getting it supported also won’t be especially simple, especially from the UI side. It’s simple to check if ever