Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Web Client and Load Balancer

2019-09-03 Thread Driscoll, Martha
Hi Josh, I did not get pound to work with websockets. I switched to ldirectord. I did this setup a year ago so I don't know if the fix in January resolved the problem. I have not tested it. I'm also using apache-websockets and have not yet switched to websocketd. Not sure if that make a

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Web Client and Load Balancer

2019-09-03 Thread Bill Erickson
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:52 AM Jason Stephenson wrote: > On 9/3/19 10:11 AM, Bill Erickson wrote: > > > After some poking around I made 2 changes > > > > 1. Use an IP address (e.g. 127.0.0.1) in the proxy_pass configuration > > instead of a hostname to bypass DNS. > > 2. Drop the keepalive

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Web Client and Load Balancer

2019-09-03 Thread Jason Stephenson
On 9/3/19 10:11 AM, Bill Erickson wrote: > After some poking around I made 2 changes > > 1. Use an IP address (e.g. 127.0.0.1) in the proxy_pass configuration > instead of a hostname to bypass DNS.   > 2. Drop the keepalive timeout from the default of 65s to 5s or so. There is no keepalive

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Web Client and Load Balancer

2019-09-03 Thread Jason Stephenson
Josh, It's interesting to me that you reply to Martha's email today. We recently started using nginx proxy on the brick heads with ldirectord running on our load balancers. We've had issues where ldirectord dies about one per week on each load balancer. It appears that the load balancer is

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Web Client and Load Balancer

2019-09-03 Thread Josh Stompro
Martha, I just saw your post. We are also using pound proxy, and looking to upgrade to 3.3 and use the web staff client. Did you get it to work with pound. It looks like historically pound proxy has had trouble with websockets [1], but there was a release early this year with a fix perhaps [2]?