Hi Sharon,
We (I) empathize. Sincerely. It's not easy. We use all of it, or try. We've
learned a lot and keep on learning.
In our consortium we currently have three library systems using Acquisitions.
The systems are different in size, budget, workflows and vendors. Each
encounters different
tested this issue on more recent versions.
Jennifer
Quoting "St. John, Leslie" <lstj...@georgialibraries.org>:
> We have encountered a couple of limits on the Acquisitions
> functionality Load Catalog Record ID's. First we can not load more
> than 50 record id's, and
We have encountered a couple of limits on the Acquisitions functionality Load
Catalog Record ID's. First we can not load more than 50 record id's, and then
only 25 will display. Therefore only 25 catalog record ID's can be loaded at a
time. Do these limits generally replicate anyone's else's
Tina,
Call Marin, she will and can help with the influx of messages, but you have to
ask her.
Leslie St. John
PINES Consultant
Georgia Public Library Service
A Unit of the University System of Georgia
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, GA 30345-4304
404-235-7129
Message -
From: St. John, Leslie lstj...@georgialibraries.org
To: Evergreen Discussion Group open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 4:01:03 PM
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Third Party Credit Card Vendors
Tina,
Call Marin, she will and can help with the influx
Rogan,
For me, it is not so much that Evergreen isn't allowing reports its more that
they are so hard to construct from the existing sources. Acq has a lot of
tables and finding the one that meets your reporting needs is fairly daunting.
So my wish would be for a couple of sources along the
Christine,
Thanks for posting the minutes. I'm looking forward to a bit of lively
discussion on the list and the August meeting. I need to keep learning.
Leslie
Leslie St. John
PINES Consultant
Georgia Public Library Service
A Unit of the University System of Georgia
1800 Century Place,
. John, Leslie wrote:
We have had trouble uploading vendor order record files with $ in the 020 |c
and 022 |c. Up until this point each of our vendors has been able to accomodate
our request for no $ in the upload files but now we have a vendor that can't
accommodate our request and say
for synchronizing data between Evergreen and the
vendor. Item (copy) IDs are not included by default, but can be with a change
to the EDI template.
What problem are you trying to solve, exactly?
-b
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:30 PM, St. John, Leslie
lstj
Although Acquisitions related questions tend to not get answered, I'm putting
this out here anyway in hope of hooking someone.
On the advice of several Acquisitions users to include line item id's and/or
purchase order id's in EDI communications with vendors we created a consortial
Hi Michael and all,
Although we are only in the testing phase I have discovered when uploading
records using the Acquisitions Load MARC Order Records that default barcode
prefix and call numbers are applied to copies when the line item is ordered.
So the purchase order has to be activated
I've been analyzing our holds processes for a while and your conversation got
me going back around to do some double checking a couple of things. So we just
performed a test on the scenario presented; a copy is missing, then found,
checked-in but not immediately targeted; and reconfirmed what
Kathy,
PINES agrees with your approach and finds no objections or reasons why this
shouldn't happen. Thanks.
Leslie St. John
PINES
Georgia Public Library Service
A Unit of the University System of Georgia
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, GA 30345-4304
lstj...@georgialibraries.org
Is anyone using Best Hold Selection Sort Order?
We're testing 2.5 and would appreciate a chat if you have a little time.
Thanks so much.
--
Leslie St. John
lstj...@georgialibraries.org
PINES
Georgia Public Library Service,
A Unit of the University System of Georgia
1800 Century Place, Suite
14 matches
Mail list logo
