[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Is 264 field indexed and visible in 2.5 version?

2014-07-31 Thread Trisha Cantwell Keene
Are folks still utilizing the 260 for publication/distributor information or can we now use 264? Thanks Trisha -- Trisha Cantwell Keene Associate Director Thorndike Library College of the Atlantic 109 Eden St. Bar Harbor, ME 04609 (207) 801-5661 (207) 288-2328 Fax tcantw...@coa.edu Google can

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Is 264 field indexed and visible in 2.5 version?

2014-07-31 Thread Yamil Suarez
Trisha, As far as I know, and I could be wrong, no version of EG supports the displaying the (RDA) 264 tag. Jason Stephenson, from MVLC, wrote some code that takes care of displaying the 264 data on the OPAC for the full bib display. That code change has not been officially approved to be added

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Is 264 field indexed and visible in 2.5 version?

2014-07-31 Thread Ben Shum
Hi Trisha and Yamil, For clarification, tag 264 for *publisher* data was developed and part of Evergreen 2.4 and was subsequently backported to 2.2.9 and 2.3.7 as well (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1071505). Indexing publisher information has not been done to my knowledge by

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Is 264 field indexed and visible in 2.5 version?

2014-07-31 Thread Kathy Lussier
Hi Trisha, In terms of indexing, Evergreen by default does not index publication information, even when this information is stored the 260 tag. I think this decision was probably made so that a search for little brown bear didn't retrieve a bunch of records published by Little Brown. We