I know the standard wisdom is Whichever OP your organization has
standardized on is the best OS for installing Evergreen-ILS however I am
in a position to test and try stuff with minimal red tape (barring
structural alteration).
I understand Evergreen has been tested on Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora and
Wolf,
Debian is a good choice as are Ubuntu and Fedora. These are three most
popular distros among the developer community, so you'll get the most
help in IRC with these. There are also make targets for installing
prerequisites on these distros, so the installation will be easier
with
I'm still a relatively new to Linux server administration, but I'll
throw in my two cents.
When we first setup Evergreen 1.4, we used Debian Lenny, as that was the
recommendation at the time. Shortly thereafter, Evergreen 1.6 came out,
and we continued using Debian Lenny since we had become
Hi Wolf,
I understand Evergreen has been tested on Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora and RHEL.
From your experience
what are the hurdles or the differences in using one over another. Presume
equal skill in all of
these Distros. Are there other distros that work easier, more dependably?
Have you
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Jason Stephenson jstephen...@mvlc.orgwrote:
Wolf,
Debian is a good choice as are Ubuntu and Fedora. These are three most
popular distros among the developer community, so you'll get the most help
in IRC with these. There are also make targets for installing
Quoting Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com:
Jason,
Standing on the shoulders of those who made the install targets distributed
with EG2.1, I hacked together my own additions to target Ubuntu 11.10. It
seemed to work alright except for shoe-horning in Postgresql-9.1. I am sure
it is more
I have been learning to use git for local development. My own little
projects do not have but 1 contributor but it helps me keep track of
changes.
http://sourcefreedom.com
On Nov 29, 2011 2:37 PM, Jason Stephenson jstephen...@mvlc.org wrote:
Quoting Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com:
Jason,
