[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration

2014-04-04 Thread Bill Erickson
Hi All, I've posted a dev log entry briefly discussing the merits/challenges of two different integration paths for the browser client: http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=dev:browser_staff:dev_notes (see 2014-04-04) I've focused primarily on the technical aspects, but the decision at

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration

2014-04-04 Thread Dan Scott
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 10:25:56AM -0400, McCanna, Terran wrote: My preference would be to leave the existing client as is (with the exception of bug fixes, etc.), but to offer the browser-based modules as options once they become available. My reasons for this are: 1) It will allow for

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration

2014-04-04 Thread Rogan Hamby
At the Hack-A-Way we discussed the piecemeal method of integrating the new staff client into the XUL app as a way of easing people into it. I've always been OK with that approach but I don't prefer it. I think we would waste precious resources trying to frankenstein them. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration

2014-04-04 Thread Jason Etheridge
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Rogan Hamby rogan.ha...@yclibrary.net wrote: At the Hack-A-Way we discussed the piecemeal method of integrating the new staff client into the XUL app as a way of easing people into it. I've always been OK with that approach but I don't prefer it. I think we

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration

2014-04-04 Thread Kate Butler
] On Behalf Of Rogan Hamby Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 10:40 AM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Cc: Evergreen Development Discussion List Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration At the Hack-A-Way we discussed the piecemeal method of integrating the new staff

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration

2014-04-04 Thread Lynn Floyd
-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of McCanna, Terran Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 10:26 AM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Cc: Evergreen Development Discussion List Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration

2014-04-04 Thread Galen Charlton
Hi, On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:25 AM, McCanna, Terran tmcca...@georgialibraries.org wrote: My preference would be to leave the existing client as is (with the exception of bug fixes, etc.), but to offer the browser-based modules as options once they become available. +1 for the reasons that

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration

2014-04-04 Thread Forrest, Stuart
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Lynn Floyd Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 12:27 PM To: 'Evergreen Discussion Group' Cc: 'Evergreen Development Discussion List' Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration +1 Terran. Why invest in making

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration

2014-04-04 Thread Justin Hopkins
Development Discussion List' Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration +1 Terran. Why invest in making the changes to the current client, I am of the let's peal the band aide off quickly approach. Lynn Floyd lfl...@andersonlibrary.org Anderson County Library 864