Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Batch Importing Baker Taylor records

2013-11-11 Thread Rogan Hamby
I've imported BT records before. I can't recall any issues, at least anything that was significant enough to stand out in my memory. On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Schooff, Rose (LVA) rose.scho...@lva.virginia.gov wrote: Has anyone out there had a problem with importing Baker Taylor

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Batch Importing Baker Taylor records

2013-11-11 Thread Tim Spindler
We also have a number of libraries using Baker Taylor. We have not seen this issue. Tim Spindler C/W MARS On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Rogan Hamby rogan.ha...@yclibrary.netwrote: I've imported BT records before. I can't recall any issues, at least anything that was significant enough

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Batch Importing Baker Taylor records

2013-11-11 Thread Mary Llewellyn
Hi Rose, We set up our match set for loading order records to match on tag 020 or 024, or (028 a and 028 b) or 035, or tag 001. That last one was set up as a record attribute since 001 doesn't have a subfield like the other tags. Baker Taylor uses tag 001 for their control numbers (BK#),