[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Custom See Also

2015-11-05 Thread Scott Thomas
Hi, We have been on Evergreen since March, and this is the first time this came up. How would one add a custom See Also reference? There does not seem to be a way to do this under Manage Authorities. We are in a consortium so I will likely not do it, but am curious nonetheless. This was

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] In-Process items, centralized cataloging, filling random holds, not in Best Hold Selection order

2015-11-05 Thread Hardy, Elaine
Josh, While we don't do centralized cataloging for the entire consortium, individual systems catalog at their headquarters and then send the items to owning branches. The items are in process until they are received by circulation at each branch. That is how in process was designed to function

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] In-Process items, centralized cataloging, filling random holds, not in Best Hold Selection order

2015-11-05 Thread Josh Stompro
Thanks Elaine, I found out that the issue I was having with the specific title that seemed to fill the wrong hold was because our migrated holds all had a selection_depth of 1, and holds placed post migration have a selection depth of 0. We had the selection depth included in our Best Hold

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] FW: Evergreen Acquistions vs some other method

2015-11-05 Thread Sharon Douglas
We've been struggling to get Evergreen Acquistions set up and working, and are gaining ground. But it's time for us to evaluate the pro/con of even using an acquisition module, vs. using some other method. I've got 3 questions for everyone... 1) Do you use Evergreen Acqisitions and if

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] In-Process items, centralized cataloging, filling random holds, not in Best Hold Selection order

2015-11-05 Thread Josh Stompro
Elaine, We just tried to work though how it would work to send items out without checking them in and I don't think we can make it work. There is nothing on the items themselves that say which branch they go to, so we cannot simple look at the item to know where to send it. We float

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] FW: Evergreen Acquistions vs some other method

2015-11-05 Thread Elisabeth Keppler
Forsyth County NC used to use the Evergreen acquisitions module, but because the County would not allow us to track money that way (we are required to use the County Finance Department's methods), it was much more trouble than it was worth. We were tracking in multiple places. Now, once the PO

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] FW: Evergreen Acquistions vs some other method

2015-11-05 Thread St. John, Leslie
Hi Sharon, We (I) empathize. Sincerely. It's not easy. We use all of it, or try. We've learned a lot and keep on learning. In our consortium we currently have three library systems using Acquisitions. The systems are different in size, budget, workflows and vendors. Each encounters different

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Custom See Also

2015-11-05 Thread Yamil Suarez
Scott, I am not a cataloger, but I work a lot with authorities in EG. I am a little confused by your questions. Again this may be because I am not a cataloger. If you are referring to be able to see a "see also" entries when using "manage authorities," I think that cannot be currently done. If

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Linux VPS

2015-11-05 Thread Bruce Willms
We are just gearing up to set up an instance of Evergreen and are wondering if anyone is running the system on a hosted VPS service like Linode. It seems like a reasonable solution in our case since we don't have IT staff to support a server, etc. I'm curious to know if others have done this and