Hello,
I wanted to announce that the online DIG AsciiDoc training will be held this
Wednesday, November 13th at 11 AM EST. This training is in preparation of the
2013 DIG hack-a-way happening on Friday, November 15th.
I will be using a Google Hangout On Air, so you can just passively watch in
Hello all,
I am happy and relieved to announce the first general release of Evergreen 2.5,
version 2.5.0. As usual for full releases, you may check out the Changelog,
read the release notes, or download the installation files here:
http://evergreen-ils.org/egdownloads/
I also want to
Has anyone out there had a problem with importing Baker Taylor records –
tweaks you had to make to the system etc. I seem to have a couple of libraries
that are importing records that are creating duplicates (but I’m not sure of
all the check/non checks they have on/off at the moment).
I've imported BT records before. I can't recall any issues, at least
anything that was significant enough to stand out in my memory.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Schooff, Rose (LVA)
rose.scho...@lva.virginia.gov wrote:
Has anyone out there had a problem with importing Baker Taylor
We also have a number of libraries using Baker Taylor. We have not seen
this issue.
Tim Spindler
C/W MARS
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Rogan Hamby rogan.ha...@yclibrary.netwrote:
I've imported BT records before. I can't recall any issues, at least
anything that was significant enough
Hi Rose,
We set up our match set for loading order records to match on tag 020 or
024, or (028 a and 028 b) or 035, or tag 001. That last one was set up as a
record attribute since 001 doesn't have a subfield like the other tags.
Baker Taylor uses tag 001 for their control numbers (BK#),
