Huh, so the lines you shared seem strange and not what I would have
expected, especially:
2 | 720 H74 1979| 720_H74_1979000
For the year to be padded with 0's instead of the first group of numbers
(the 720) looks weird. And surely explains a lot about why sorting seems
off. I just
We are looking at pursing development on an editable checkout history. To
that end, I have posted some functional specifications for this development
in a launchpad ticket and we are looking for comment from the community.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1099979
Hi Tim,
You linked to the wrong bug. It looks like it should be
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1312699.
Kathy
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
kluss...@masslnc.org
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
On 4/25/2014
I need to correct my above link. Kathy pointed out I linked to the wrong
bug. Please refer to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1312699
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Tim Spindler tjspind...@gmail.com wrote:
We are looking at pursing development on an editable checkout history.
Hello Paul,
You've pretty much nailed your problem as being the extra decimals before your
Cutters. While that's normal for an LC call number, I've looked around and
found nothing to make me believe that's common or accepted practice for DDC.
That said, as far as I can tell, the standard
Okay, looking more carefully at the sortkey Ben pointed out, you really do have
two different problems affecting your sort. Sorry for focusing on the smaller
one!
Everything I advocated earlier still stands, but in the meantime, we do need to
fix the misplaced padding in the 'no decimal but
To whom it may concern
Hello My name is Erick
I'm emailing in reference to a problem that I have with Evergreen.
I'm from Mexico and I am using Evergreen at the Library in my job but I
have this problem When I'm trying to import some records in the MARC batch
import, when I use a record match
Erick,
I am not a cataloger and I rarely use record match sets, therefore I
don't think I can help you. I suspect that for others to be able to
help you they would need to know more information of how you are
setting up your record match sets. Like what tags you are trying to
match on, and any
Gracias escribiré mas información en mi correo
tratare de enviarlo a algún catalogador.
Buen día
2014-04-25 13:36 GMT-05:00 Yamil Suarez ysua...@berklee.edu:
Erick,
I am not a cataloger and I rarely use record match sets, therefore I
don't think I can help you. I suspect that for others to
-- Forwarded message --
From: Erick Emir Alonso Roman erickemir1...@gmail.com
Date: 2014-04-25 13:50 GMT-05:00
Subject: Problem with Record match Set on Evergreen
To: evergreen-catalog...@list.evergreen-ils.org
To whom it may concern
Hello My name is Erick
I'm emailing in
Dewey cutters shouldn't have decimal points preceding them.
Many publics use just the first few letters of the authors name for the
cutter and often don't use a year designation when they build a DDC call
number. However, just like in LCC, you can generate alpha-numeric cutters
using the first
Hello all,
With 2.6.0 cut 10 days ago, it is high time for me to give one final update
before I pass the torch. I haven't given a formal email progress summary since
the beta (though a verbal update was given at the conference), so we'll be
looking back at both the RC and the 2.6 final
12 matches
Mail list logo
