I agree about the policy and workflow differences from system to system. One of
the beauties of Evergreen is that it's so flexible to meet different needs of
different types of institutions and consortiums.
In PINES, our training integrates policy training along with software usage and
best
Terran,
My thinking exactly. It would be a lot of work to create and maintain but
is also a good opportunity for folks who want to pitch in. I also think
that many consortia use Evergreen so differently that they would prefer
their training to be more specifically geared toward their own
Sharing this (below sig) with their permission.
--
Jason Etheridge
| Community and Migration Manager
| Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
| phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
| email: ja...@esilibrary.com
| web: http://www.esilibrary.com
-- Forwarded message --
From:
I think it would be a good community project, but it would definitely be an
extraordinary amount of work to do and to maintain. Since more people have been
joining the community recently, perhaps that would be a great way to get
involved? (I do not have the capacity to volunteer to coordinate
