Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Planned Parts Development

2013-01-29 Thread Tim Spindler
Elaine, We have an issue from our migration where parts are represented in multiple ways (v. 1, vol. 1, volume 1, v1, etc.). With this development, access to this would still be controlled by a permission so each implementation would decide who has permissions to make changes on this. Tim On

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Planned Parts Development

2013-01-29 Thread Hardy, Elaine
Do you mean that the call number has the vols represented differently or that your labels for monographic parts are different? I thought that how the vol was designated in the call number didn't mater to the monographic parts? Elaine _ J. Elaine Hardy PINES Bibliographic Projects

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Planned Parts Development

2013-01-29 Thread Tim Spindler
Elaine, This was actually how it is represented in the Parts field because our previous system had used a free text field for Volume that is equivalent to parts in Evergreen and related to identify how holds can be placed. Tim On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Hardy, Elaine

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Planned Parts Development

2013-01-29 Thread Hardy, Elaine
Janet sent me an email offlist explaining how you migrated from vols in your call number to monographic parts. Elaine _ J. Elaine Hardy PINES Bibliographic Projects Metadata Manager Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Ste 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304 404.235-7128