Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen web page for paid
support vendors
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Kathy Lussier
kluss...@masslnc.org mailto:kluss...@masslnc.org wrote:
Hi all,
[snip
: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen web page for paid support vendors
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Kathy Lussier kluss...@masslnc.org wrote:
Hi all,
[snip]
Defining Evergreen services: I'm open to not defining what an
Evergreen service is and to see how it goes. My personal preference
-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Mike
Rylander
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:36 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen web page for paid support vendors
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4
with this issue, I have no objections at all.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Kathy Lussier kluss...@masslnc.org
To: Evergreen General Discussion List
open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:28:44 PM
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen web page
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Kathy
Lussier
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:29 PM
To: Evergreen General Discussion List
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen web page for paid support vendors
Hi all,
At the June Oversight Board meeting (minutes available at
http
While I am personally an active community member, I'm also an employee
of a service provider, so unless I see something that seems
particularly antagonistic toward service providers I'll stay out of
most of this discussion except to say this: in my opinion, the purpose
of the page is not well
On 07/10/2013 10:45 AM, Mike Rylander wrote:
While I am personally an active community member, I'm also an employee
of a service provider, so unless I see something that seems
particularly antagonistic toward service providers I'll stay out of
most of this discussion except to say this: in my
Like Mike, I plan to stay out of the primary service provider discussion
unless asked for my opinion. However, I would like to echo what he says
about 3rd party vendors. I recognize what a burden it would be for the
community to vet and maintain a page that highlights vendors that are known
not
Hi all,
Great discussion so far! I just wanted to respond to a few
points/questions that were raised.
I would be interested if a specific incident brought this issue to the
forefront or if this is just a general concern. (i.e., are we pre-emptively
solving a problem that hasn't happened,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Kathy Lussier kluss...@masslnc.org wrote:
Hi all,
[snip]
Defining Evergreen services: I'm open to not defining what an Evergreen
service is and to see how it goes. My personal preference is that Evergreen
support providers not be confused with third-party
Hi all,
At the June Oversight Board meeting (minutes available at
http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=governance:minutes:2013-6-20),
I raised the question of whether the Evergreen community should develop
a policy regarding the paid support vendors that are listed on the
Evergreen
I am definitely in favor of Rogans +1s as we have had experience of vendors
promising working with Evergreen and in fact not wholly producing the goods.
Excuse my brevity
Sent from my iPad
Stuart Forrest
Library Systems Specialist
Beaufort County Library
On Jul 9, 2013, at 18:35, Lori Ayre
I agree:
Vendors sending an email describing their services +1
Requiring that they add a visible link to the project web site +1
Annual re-registration +1
Confirmation of references. Are they satisfied customers? +1
-
Rev. James R Shaw
Vice President of Administration
13 matches
Mail list logo
