Tim,
That looks like a good set of enhancements. Just one comment and one
question:
* I suspect that the DISK 15.1 anomaly is caused by an extra space
between DISK and 15.1, which gets it an extra pile of zeroes.
* Do you plan to leave the existing sort label infrastructure there, and
use
Mike,
The coding table design decisions will ultimately be up to Dan Pearl (our
in house developer) but I was thinking the label_sortkey would not be
eliminated since that would be a default sort. I personally was
envisioning that an extra table column would be needed for sort order
whereby
29, 2013 11:38 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group; open-ils-...@list.georgialibraries.org
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Planned Parts Development
We are looking for comment on the proposed development. Attached is the
specification.
--
Tim Spindler
Manager
Elaine asks:
Have you
considering, rather than Pt 2 merging labels changing it to making
managing parts permissions at the consortium level rather than the
local
level? That would solve the duplicate label issue and move the
management
further up the hierarchical structure. This would
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Planned Parts Development
Elaine asks:
Have you
considering, rather than Pt 2 merging labels changing it to making
managing parts permissions at the consortium level rather than the
local level? That would solve the duplicate label issue and move the
management
