Thanks again everyone for your guidance. We have implemented the Located
URI method and hope that all is now well.
Does anyone have a suggestion on how to confirm that all of the titles are
displaying correctly in all of the catalogs? I tried a general keyword
search using the term "Online
Hi Don,
There are a couple of approaches you could take.
You could use a different bib source for records that should be
retrieved system-wide than you do for the ones that require the Located
URI. The bib source for the former would be transcendent.
Alternatively, you could use a Located
Kathy,
We changed the transcendent set to False and now the only records appearing
in the respective catalogs are those that include a $9 in the 856 field. I
take it that a $9ASLAN needs to be added so that all Open Access bib
records can display in all the catalogs ... or is there better way?
Thanks Deborah, Elaine, and Mike. I have made adjustments to the Copy
Locations and Copy Status tables, and believe that will solve some of our
"not showing up" in the OPAC problem.
Now for the opposite problem. We have ebook records showing up in OPACs
where they should not be showing. Here is
Hi Don,
A title must have at least one copy, at least one located URI, or use
transcendent bibliographic source in order to show up in the public
catalog.
http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/dev/_cataloging_electronic_resources_8201_8212_8201_finding_them_in_catalog_searches.html
A no anywhere over rides a yes any where. If your item attributes say yes,
if the shelving location or the item status definition says no, the item
will be invisible.
Elaine
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
Georgia Public Library Service/PINES
1800 Century Place, Ste. 150
Hi Don,
It could be a few things. If you look at the Copy Editor, do the items say
OPAC visible? Also, is the shelving location they are on OPAC visible
(Local Admin--Copy Locations Editor)? And, finally, is the status OPAC
visible (System Admin--Copy Statuses)?
Any/all of those things could
