On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 04:38:43PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > + if (hostt->device_configure)
> > + ret = hostt->device_configure(sdev, );
> > + else if (hostt->slave_configure)
> > + ret = hostt->slave_configure(sdev);
> > +
> > + ret2 =
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 01:35:08PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> There are two methods with names that are politically charged:
> slave_configure() and slave_alloc(). Shouldn't both be renamed?
Probably. This series howerver doesn't actually renames anything,
it just adds a new method that
On 3/24/24 16:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
This is a version of ->slave_configure that also takes a queue_limits
structure that the caller applies, and thus allows drivers to reconfigure
the queue using the atomic queue limits API.
In the long run it should also replace ->slave_configure
On 3/25/24 08:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This is a version of ->slave_configure that also takes a queue_limits
> structure that the caller applies, and thus allows drivers to reconfigure
> the queue using the atomic queue limits API.
>
> In the long run it should also replace
This is a version of ->slave_configure that also takes a queue_limits
structure that the caller applies, and thus allows drivers to reconfigure
the queue using the atomic queue limits API.
In the long run it should also replace ->slave_configure entirely as
there is no need to have two different
