Re: How to resurrect SCSI device

2012-06-11 Thread niejasiek
i'm not using multipath, and it seems that i have the exact same problem. (identical ietd version, debian squeeze on amd64, open-iscsi as initiator) when i restart ietd during i/o, the session on the initiator side goes unsuable readonly, with no way to get it working other than logout/login

Re: How to resurrect SCSI device

2012-06-11 Thread Mike Christie
On 06/11/2012 07:43 AM, niejasiek wrote: i'm not using multipath, and it seems that i have the exact same problem. (identical ietd version, debian squeeze on amd64, open-iscsi as initiator) when i restart ietd during i/o, the session on the initiator side goes unsuable readonly, with no

Re: [PATCH] iscsid: Add support for net_prio cgroups

2012-06-11 Thread Mike Christie
On 06/08/2012 11:10 PM, Anish Bhatt wrote: Mike, Has there been any progress in figuring out how DCB would co-exist with net prio cgroups since you removed DCB support ? -Anish I think people were saying to do something with cgdcbxd. Are you guys using DCB with iSCSI for software

RE: [PATCH] iscsid: Add support for net_prio cgroups

2012-06-11 Thread Anish Bhatt
I was looking at support for cxgb*i, since open-iscsi previously only had DCB support for the software initiator. I'm guessing with cgdcbxd the task of looking up cgroup and assigning priority to the traffic is left to the individual transports now ? -Anish One socket to bind them all.

Re: [PATCH] iscsid: Add support for net_prio cgroups

2012-06-11 Thread Mike Christie
On 06/11/2012 06:08 PM, Anish Bhatt wrote: I was looking at support for cxgb*i, since open-iscsi previously only had DCB support for the software initiator. I'm guessing with cgdcbxd the task of looking up cgroup and assigning priority to the traffic is left to the individual transports now ?

RE: [PATCH] iscsid: Add support for net_prio cgroups

2012-06-11 Thread Anish Bhatt
We're doing it in firmware as well, since it already has all DCB info. I was just checking if there was any plan to make the transports interact with cgroups in a uniform way, as previously DCB was left upto individual implementations. Guess not. -Anish One socket to bind them all.