Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0

2016-12-22 Thread Chris Leech
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 07:53:50AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Chris Leech wrote: > > I'm not reproducing any problems with xfstests running over iscsi_tcp > > right now. Two 10G luns exported from an LIO target, attached directly > > to a test VM

Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0

2016-12-22 Thread Chris Leech
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 05:50:12PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 09:46:37PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > > > There may be deeper issues. I just started running scalability tests > > >

Re: iscsistart -N skips offload NICs causing boot to fail on debian

2016-12-22 Thread Andrew Patterson
On 12/20/2016 12:28 PM, Andrew Patterson wrote: > On 12/20/2016 12:13 PM, Mike Christie wrote: >> On 12/20/2016 12:15 PM, Andrew Patterson wrote: >>> On 12/12/2016 02:38 PM, Andrew Patterson wrote: On Friday, December 9, 2016 at 3:33:57 PM UTC-7, Mike Christie wrote:

Re: Problem with iSCSI connected LTO-2 tape drive

2016-12-22 Thread The Lee-Man
Hi David: I have created Issue#35 for this on github. On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 2:00:15 PM UTC-8, David C. Partridge wrote: > > You’re right, it is in section 8.2. Maybe it needs to be said in 8.1.1 as > well? > > > > Dave > > > > *From:* open-iscsi@googlegroups.com

Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0

2016-12-22 Thread Dave Chinner
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 09:46:37PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > There may be deeper issues. I just started running scalability tests > > (e.g. 16-way fsmark create tests) and about a minute in I got a > >

Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0

2016-12-22 Thread Dave Chinner
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:13:22PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 04:13:03PM -0800, Chris Leech wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:19:15PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > >

Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0

2016-12-22 Thread Dave Chinner
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 04:13:03PM -0800, Chris Leech wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:19:15PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:59:06AM -0800, Chris Leech wrote: > > >>

Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0

2016-12-22 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > There may be deeper issues. I just started running scalability tests > (e.g. 16-way fsmark create tests) and about a minute in I got a > directory corruption reported - something I hadn't seen in the dev > cycle at all.

Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0

2016-12-22 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 05:30:46PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > For "normal" bios the for_each_segment loop iterates over bi_vcnt, > > so it will be ignored anyway. That being said both I and the lists > > got CCed halfway through the thread and I haven't seen the original > > report, so I'm

Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0

2016-12-22 Thread Dave Chinner
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 07:18:27AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:19:15PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Looking around a bit, the only even halfway suspicious scatterlist > > initialization thing I see is commit f9d03f96b988 ("block: improve > > handling of the

Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0

2016-12-22 Thread Dave Chinner
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:59:06AM -0800, Chris Leech wrote: > Thanks Dave, > > I'm hitting a bug at scatterlist.h:140 before I even get any iSCSI > modules loaded (virtio block) so there's something else going on in the > current merge window. I'll keep an eye on it and make sure there's >

Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0

2016-12-22 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:19:15PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Looking around a bit, the only even halfway suspicious scatterlist > initialization thing I see is commit f9d03f96b988 ("block: improve > handling of the magic discard payload") which used to have a magic > hack wrt !bio->bi_vcnt,

Re: [4.10, panic, regression] iscsi: null pointer deref at iscsi_tcp_segment_done+0x20d/0x2e0

2016-12-22 Thread Linus Torvalds
Hi, On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:59:06AM -0800, Chris Leech wrote: >> Thanks Dave, >> >> I'm hitting a bug at scatterlist.h:140 before I even get any iSCSI >> modules loaded (virtio block) so there's something else going

Re: [PATCH 5/8] linux: drop __bitwise__ everywhere

2016-12-22 Thread Luca Coelho
On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 07:15 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > __bitwise__ used to mean "yes, please enable sparse checks > unconditionally", but now that we dropped __CHECK_ENDIAN__ > __bitwise is exactly the same. > There aren't many users, replace it by __bitwise everywhere. > > Signed-off-by: