>>> Adam Hutchinson schrieb am 15.06.2022 um 20:57 in
Nachricht
:
> Is there any reason not to use time as an indicator that pending R2Ts
> need to be processed? Could R2Ts be tagged with a timestamp when
> received and only given priority over new commands if the age of the
> R2T at the head
Hi Ulrich,
> In my primitive point of view iSCSI is just "another type of cable", making
> me wonder:
> Is iSCSI allowed to reorder the requests at all? Shouldn't the block layer or
> initiator do
> so, or the target doing out-of order processing (tagged queueing)?
iSCSI RFC does not require
Hi!
In my primitive point of view iSCSI is just "another type of cable", making me
wonder:
Is iSCSI allowed to reorder the requests at all? Shouldn't the block layer or
initiator do so, or the target doing out-of order processing (tagged queueing)?
I mean: If there is a problem that occurs
>>> Mike Christie schrieb am 08.06.2022 um 17:36
>>> in
Nachricht <48af6f5f-c3b6-ac65-836d-518153ab2...@oracle.com>:
> On 6/8/22 9:16 AM, Dmitriy Bogdanov wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>>> On 6/7/22 10:55 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
On 6/7/22 8:19 AM, Dmitry Bogdanov wrote:
> In function
