>>> The Lee-Man schrieb am 27.09.2016 um 03:50 in
Nachricht :
> Christoph Hellwig suggested we do away with the open-iscsi google group
> (this group) and use linux-scsi.
Obviously linux-scsi is more generic.
>
>
On 09/26/2016 05:25 PM, Lee Duncan wrote:
> Chris Leech and I are taking over as open-iscsi maintainers.
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Updated URL to open-iscsi.com
> * Removed git repository, since code in tree
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
> "Lee" == Lee Duncan writes:
Lee> Yes, that would be great. Thank you.
Applied to 4.9/scsi-queue.
>> Is it your plan to go through the SCSI tree?
Lee> Yes, the iscsi initiator kernel code updates have been going
Lee> through the Linux SCSI mailing list and repository
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 06:50:19PM -0700, The Lee-Man wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig suggested we do away with the open-iscsi google group
> (this group) and use linux-scsi.
>
> Any thoughts on this? (removed others on the cc list).
I'm OK with moving to linux-scsi if they don't mind userspace
Christoph Hellwig suggested we do away with the open-iscsi google group
(this group) and use linux-scsi.
Any thoughts on this? (removed others on the cc list).
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 3:26:36 PM UTC-7, Lee Duncan wrote:
>
> Chris Leech and I are taking over as open-iscsi maintainers.
> "Lee" == Lee Duncan writes:
Lee,
Lee> Chris Leech and I are taking over as open-iscsi maintainers.
Do you want me to queue the MAINTAINER update?
Lee> * Removed git repository, since code in tree
Is it your plan to go through the SCSI tree?
--
Martin K. Petersen
Chris Leech and I are taking over as open-iscsi maintainers.
Changes since v1:
* Updated URL to open-iscsi.com
* Removed git repository, since code in tree
---
MAINTAINERS | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index