Re: Antw: Re: [RFC 1/3] iscsid: Changes to support the new qedi transport

2016-10-20 Thread Javali, Nilesh
Hi Chris, Lee, Adding a field in transport structure, like below, -- 8< -- diff --git a/usr/initiator_common.c b/usr/initiator_common.c index dd3f3c4..191e779 100644 --- a/usr/initiator_common.c +++ b/usr/initiator_common.c @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ int iscsi_host_set_net_params(struct iface_rec

Re: Antw: Re: [RFC 1/3] iscsid: Changes to support the new qedi transport

2016-10-20 Thread The Lee-Man
In this case, I'd like to see you create a "class" of transports that have this feature. Or perhaps it can be a field in the transport structure? I dislike checking against one transport, as Chris also mentioned. On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 11:38:08 PM UTC-7, Javali, Nilesh wrote: > > >

Re: Antw: Re: [RFC 1/3] iscsid: Changes to support the new qedi transport

2016-10-20 Thread Javali, Nilesh
On 20/10/16, 12:00 PM, "open-iscsi@googlegroups.com on behalf of Ulrich Windl" on behalf of ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: Chris Leech

Antw: Re: [RFC 1/3] iscsid: Changes to support the new qedi transport

2016-10-20 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Chris Leech schrieb am 19.10.2016 um 19:14 in Nachricht <20161019171452.iflp5nibq7yzi...@straylight.hirudinean.org>: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 01:02:18AM -0400, nilesh.jav...@cavium.com wrote: >> From: Nilesh Javali >> >> qedi is not attached to