On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:52:49PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:45:11PM -0800, Kmec wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > > IIRC IOmeter for Linux had some issues.. related to queue depth maybe? 
> > > > So
> > > > you should use other tools than IOmeter on Linux. Dunno if that problem 
> > > > is
> > > > already fixed or if there is a patch available for IOmeter for Linux..
> > >
> > > Oh, and please try using 'noop' elevator/scheduler on your iSCSI disks..
> > > that might help with the performance.
> > >
> > 
> > noop scheduler didn't help at all :-(
> > 
> > What is curious that we can't get more than 62 MBps from single NIC :-
> > (
> > 
> 
> Earlier you said you got 90 MBps from a single NIC.. 
> 
> How did you measure this? Please paste the commands used.. 
> 
> Did you verify both the paths are connected to different interface on EQL
> array? You can check this with "iscsiadm -m session -P3"
> 
> Another question: Which MPIO load balance policy did you use in Windows?
> (round-robin, weighted path, least queue depth?)
> 

.. And did you have the Equallogic MPIO DSM installed on Windows? 

-- Pasi

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to