On 03/08/2013 04:18 AM, Adheer Chandravanshi wrote:
> I guess the confusion is because of the macro names ISCSIOPT_ERL1 and
> ISCSIOPT_ERL0. These do not correspond to actual erl level 1 and 0.
Ah, I see now. Thanks for the info. Looks ok to me then. Send them to
linux-scsi.
--
You received thi
Mike Christie Mar 07 01:43AM -0600 wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2013 06:06 PM, Lee Duncan wrote:
> > ISCSI_ERR_SCSI_EH_SESSION_RST = ISCSI_ERR_BASE + 21,
> > + ISCSI_ERR_LOGIN_FAILED = ISCSI_ERR_BASE + 22,
> > };
>
> Those errors are for the iscsi user/kernel interface.
>
> The errors you
When iscsiadm is called with "-m fw", the debug flag can be
useful.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
Signed-off-by: Lee Duncan
---
doc/iscsiadm.8 |2 +-
usr/iscsiadm.c |4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/iscsiadm.8 b/doc/iscsiadm.8
index 7c209f6..9e
When login fails because there are too many sessions we should be
returning an error code so that userland is aware that something
is amiss.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
Signed-off-by: Lee Duncan
---
usr/session_mgmt.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a
The return value from nice() is being checked for less than 0 for
an error condition, when it should be checking for "-1". This
removes the bogus iscsid startup error message "Could not increase
process priority: Success".
Signed-off-by: Lee Duncan
---
usr/iscsi_util.c |2 +-
1 file changed,
Here are 3 patches. The first one is a bug I found in how
nice() return value is being checked, and the other two are
patches that we have been carrying in the SUSE version of
open-iscsi that I wanted to pass upstream.
Lee Duncan:
[PATCH 1/3] Fix check for return from nice call
Hannes Rei
