When iscsiuio performs a lookup in it's routing table
for the default router, nothing is returned as ndpc_request()
didn't understand the 'GET_DEFAULT_ROUTER_ADDR' request.
The solution is to add the request and return the default router
address.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn jthumsh
Gnetle ping on this
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 01:38:12PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
When iscsiuio performs a lookup in it's routing table
for the default router, nothing is returned as ndpc_request()
didn't understand the 'GET_DEFAULT_ROUTER_ADDR' request.
The solution is to add
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn; Adheer Chandravanshi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iscsiuio: Fix lookup of IPv6 router address
Hi,
Don't mind if I chime in. From the upstream code, the patch looks good.
Just curious at who the caller for that might be?
Eddie
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 10:48 -0500, Mike
his in user space, though,
> than to limit the value range for the session ID here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Duncan <ldun...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumsh...@suse.de
der allocation ends up failing.
>
> The kernel will print a warning and dump_stack, like below:
There is a series of patches in Andrew's mmotm tree, which introduces
a kvmalloc() function, that does exactly what you're looking for.
Maybe you want to base your patch o
> This looks OK to me.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Chris Leech <cle...@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for review! Do you have a tree that can take this change?
>>
>> Hi Elena,
>>
>> iscsi like fcoe should go via the SCSI tree.
>
> Tha
gned-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwind...@gmail.com>
>>
>> This looks OK to me.
>>
>> Acked-by: Chris Leech <cle...@redhat.com>
>
> Thank you for review! Do you have a tree that can take this change
-after-free
situations.
The subject is wrong, should be something like "scsi: libfc convert
fc_fcp_pkt.ref_cnt from atomic_t to refcount_t" but not s390.
Other than that
Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <j...@kernel.org>
Turns out that it is better that all these patches go throug
s.
The subject is wrong, should be something like "scsi: libfc convert
fc_fcp_pkt.ref_cnt from atomic_t to refcount_t" but not s390.
Other than that
Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <j...@kernel.org>
--
Johannes Thumshirn
onstruct.
Thanks,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard,
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard,
; Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <kha...@google.com>
>
> Why is this needed? I dislike changes that don't fix anything.
The function has no more users left after patch 1, so why keep it bitrotting?
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumsh...@sus
13 matches
Mail list logo
