On 03/21/2013 08:56 PM, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
Did it just not get
picked up there by the scsi maintainer?
Yes.
Doh.
Could you pick up this patch?
Yes. Sorry about that. I will send it with my next feature window update
since this is not a bug fix.
Could you cc me when you
On 04/08/2013 03:05 AM, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
On 03/21/2013 08:56 PM, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
Did it just not get
picked up there by the scsi maintainer?
Yes.
Doh.
Could you pick up this patch?
Yes. Sorry about that. I will send it with my next feature window update
since this is not
On 03/19/2013 05:52 AM, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
In iscsi_free_task, NULL is assigned to task-sc twice: before and
after kfifo_in invocatoin. Allocating and freeing iscsi_task are guarded
with session-lock, so multiple NULL assignments cause no trouble. But
people reading the source code may be
On 03/19/2013 05:52 AM, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
In iscsi_free_task, NULL is assigned to task-sc twice: before and
after kfifo_in invocatoin. Allocating and freeing iscsi_task are guarded
with session-lock, so multiple NULL assignments cause no trouble. But
people reading the source code may be
On 03/21/2013 08:56 PM, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
Did it just not get
picked up there by the scsi maintainer?
Yes.
Doh.
Could you pick up this patch?
Yes. Sorry about that. I will send it with my next feature window update
since this is not a bug fix.
--
You received this message
On 03/21/2013 08:56 PM, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
Did it just not get
picked up there by the scsi maintainer?
Yes.
Doh.
Could you pick up this patch?
Yes. Sorry about that. I will send it with my next feature window update
since this is not a bug fix.
Thank you.
Masatake YAMATO
Replacing linux-scsi list with linux-kernel.
On Aug 12, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Masatake YAMATO yam...@redhat.com wrote:
In iscsi_free_task, NULL is assigned to task-sc twice: before and
after kfifo_in invocatoin. Allocating and freeing iscsi_task are guarded
with session-lock, so multiple NULL