In short:
Case A
Initiator: IBM x3550 (two NICs), /dev/sda (local disk), 100-120 MB/s
(hdparm -t /dev/sda).
Target:Dell (only one NIC), /dev/sda (local disk), dev/sda (IET
disk),70-90 MB/s(hdparm -t
has anybody tested this with 10Gb cards? what is the performance gains?
I have tested it lightly and found that there are some gains but without
a 10Gb switch in the mix testing is very difficult.
Paul
Yao Wei wrote:
In short:
On 8 Sep 2009 at 10:31, mala...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Yao Wei [njus...@gmail.com] wrote:
The main purpose of my using iscsi is to implement remote disk
copying.
When I installed iscsi-target on Dell machine and using the whole disk
to be the target:
Lun 0
The main purpose of my using iscsi is to implement remote disk
copying.
When I installed iscsi-target on Dell machine and using the whole disk
to be the target:
Lun 0 Path=/dev/sda,Type=fileio
then on my ibm x3550 machine (with two NICs) , I first configure NIC1
and NIC2 with different MAC
On 09/07/2009 05:46 AM, Yao Wei wrote:
The main purpose of my using iscsi is to implement remote disk
copying.
When I installed iscsi-target on Dell machine and using the whole disk
to be the target:
Lun 0 Path=/dev/sda,Type=fileio
then on my ibm x3550 machine (with two NICs) , I first
Yao Wei [njus...@gmail.com] wrote:
The main purpose of my using iscsi is to implement remote disk
copying.
When I installed iscsi-target on Dell machine and using the whole disk
to be the target:
Lun 0 Path=/dev/sda,Type=fileio
then on my ibm x3550 machine (with two NICs) , I first
On 09/04/2009 07:58 AM, Yao Wei wrote:
Dear sir:
I have tested iscsi protocols on two machines using open-iscsi and
iscsi-target. On IBM X3550 machine which has two NICs (SUSE Linux Enterprise
10.1) I simulate iscsi initiator , and on Dell Optiplex 755 machine (Fedora
8 ) for iscsi target .
