I think Rudolph is just asking why doing disk I/Os at 50MB/s translate to 80
to 100MB/s on the wire, aka 60 to 100% overhead in the protocol vs the
actual data being transfered.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Bart Van Assche
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:00 PM, wrote:
> > Hmmm maybe yo
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:00 PM, wrote:
> Hmmm maybe you misunderstood me - a performance improvement would be nice but
> that was not the point of my mail: I'm just wondering why there seems to be
> such a big overhead on the network while doing synchronus reads and writes to
> the iSCSI dev
- "Bart Van Assche" schrieb:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:21 PM, wrote:
> > my storage backend system is capable of handling writes at around
> 120MB/sec. Its running
> > the iscsi enterprise target under ubuntu hardy and the open-iscsi
> initiators are debian etch
> > systems, all connect
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:21 PM, wrote:
> my storage backend system is capable of handling writes at around 120MB/sec.
> Its running
> the iscsi enterprise target under ubuntu hardy and the open-iscsi initiators
> are debian etch
> systems, all connected via gigabit lan. Yesterday I did some
Hey Folks,
my storage backend system is capable of handling writes at around 120MB/sec.
Its running the iscsi enterprise target under ubuntu hardy and the open-iscsi
initiators are debian etch systems, all connected via gigabit lan. Yesterday I
did some load tests and it looks like I won't get
