On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Mike Christiemicha...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
On 07/31/2009 07:43 AM, Erez Zilber wrote:
I thought that this patch just reduces the timeout from 15 to 3. Does
it also fix the 3
On 08/03/2009 02:31 AM, Erez Zilber wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Mike Christiemicha...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
On 07/31/2009 07:43 AM, Erez Zilber wrote:
I thought that this patch just reduces the
On 08/03/2009 12:37 PM, Erez Zilber wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Mike Christiemicha...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
On 08/03/2009 02:31 AM, Erez Zilber wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Mike Christiemicha...@cs.wisc.edu
wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike
On 30 Jul 2009 at 19:25, Erez Zilber wrote:
Mike,
I'm seeing some strange behavior that I don't completely understand:
during heavy IO, I disconnect the cable on the target machine and
after a few seconds, I'm trying to logout from that target on the
initiator side. Here's what I see:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Mike Christiemicha...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Erez Zilber wrote:
Mike,
I'm seeing some strange behavior that I don't completely understand:
during heavy IO, I disconnect the cable on the target machine and
after a few seconds, I'm trying to
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Ulrich
Windlulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote:
On 30 Jul 2009 at 19:25, Erez Zilber wrote:
Mike,
I'm seeing some strange behavior that I don't completely understand:
during heavy IO, I disconnect the cable on the target machine and
after a few
Mike Christie wrote:
On 07/31/2009 07:43 AM, Erez Zilber wrote:
I thought that this patch just reduces the timeout from 15 to 3. Does
it also fix the 3 sndtmo periods or is it another patch? What was the
Another patch. You should have it.
bug that caused the 3 sndtmo periods waiting?
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
On 07/31/2009 07:43 AM, Erez Zilber wrote:
I thought that this patch just reduces the timeout from 15 to 3. Does
it also fix the 3 sndtmo periods or is it another patch? What was the
Another patch. You should have it.
bug that caused the 3 sndtmo
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
On 07/31/2009 07:43 AM, Erez Zilber wrote:
I thought that this patch just reduces the timeout from 15 to 3. Does
it also fix the 3 sndtmo periods or is it another patch? What was the
Another patch. You should have it.
bug that
Mike,
I'm seeing some strange behavior that I don't completely understand:
during heavy IO, I disconnect the cable on the target machine and
after a few seconds, I'm trying to logout from that target on the
initiator side. Here's what I see:
t = 0: iscsi_eh_cmd_timed_out gets called for all
Erez Zilber wrote:
Mike,
I'm seeing some strange behavior that I don't completely understand:
during heavy IO, I disconnect the cable on the target machine and
after a few seconds, I'm trying to logout from that target on the
initiator side. Here's what I see:
t = 0:
Mike Christie wrote:
Erez Zilber wrote:
Mike,
I'm seeing some strange behavior that I don't completely understand:
during heavy IO, I disconnect the cable on the target machine and
after a few seconds, I'm trying to logout from that target on the
initiator side. Here's what I see:
t = 0:
12 matches
Mail list logo