Re: recommended volume size

2008-05-21 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:39:29PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:18:22AM -0700, Terry wrote: > > > > In thinking further about this, the application pool could scale up to > > 40 TB. Is a 40 TB volume out of reality? > > > > On May 21, 11:51 am, Terry <[EMAIL PRO

Re: recommended volume size

2008-05-21 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:18:22AM -0700, Terry wrote: > > In thinking further about this, the application pool could scale up to > 40 TB. Is a 40 TB volume out of reality? > > On May 21, 11:51 am, Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am going to be connecting to an equallogic

Re: recommended volume size

2008-05-21 Thread Terry
In thinking further about this, the application pool could scale up to 40 TB. Is a 40 TB volume out of reality? On May 21, 11:51 am, Terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I am going to be connecting to an equallogic san using RHEL5 x86_64 > and serving up NFS volumes.   I don't have any

recommended volume size

2008-05-21 Thread Terry
Hello, I am going to be connecting to an equallogic san using RHEL5 x86_64 and serving up NFS volumes. I don't have any requirement as to the size on the application side. I am thinking 4TB volumes but anyone have any advice in this area? The data will be a lot of small files mostly so I'll