OpenJPA People-
The final tally of the vote is:
+1 votes: 3
Bryan Noll: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-open-
jpa-dev/200610.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Abe White: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-open-
jpa-dev/200610.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrick
Also, I noticed that you have a tearDown() in your test case.
Historically, we've typically not written tearDown() methods, and just
put the tear-down logic in the beginning of setUp(). I understand the
value of having a separate tearDown() to keep things clean, but it'd be
good if you called
Eddie-
On Oct 19, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
Marc--
A couple of comments:
#1: Since the vote has only been open for 24 hours, there may not have
been enough time for everyone to comment on the release -- while there
are already 3 +1s which are sufficient to declare a release,
On 10/19/06, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eddie-
snip
- Is there an SVN tag for this?
No, although the SVN revision number is contained in the release
(FTR, it can be seen by running: java
org.apache.openjpa.conf.OpenJPAVersion).
Is there a policy on SVN tag names for
Marc--
Quick work! Thanks for taking care of these things. Couple of comments:
I didn't realize there was a de-facto minimum time
Typically, vote time runs for 3 days, which gives folks in different
time zones and day jobs enough time to have a look.
I did follow-up with a thread on
