David-
Looks nice ... thanks!
Maybe we should start a logo contest for the OpenJPA project ...
On Dec 21, 2006, at 2:55 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Dec 21, 2006, at 1:21 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
David-
That'd be great! I mostly ripped the template off of Geronimo's,
but the Conflu
On Dec 21, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi David,
Just one question. What was the rationale for the name of the
branch for JTA
.../geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.0
Why not
.../geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jta-spec-1.1
The spec is version 1.1. What does th
Hi David,
Just one question. What was the rationale for the name of the branch
for JTA
.../geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.0
Why not
.../geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jta-spec-1.1
The spec is version 1.1. What does the 1.0 designation mean? And
without doing the hard wor
On Dec 21, 2006, at 1:21 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
David-
That'd be great! I mostly ripped the template off of Geronimo's,
but the Confluence template format was a little confusing to me, so
some of the formatting is a bit shoddy.
Please feel free to make any cosmetic improvements th
David-
That'd be great! I mostly ripped the template off of Geronimo's, but
the Confluence template format was a little confusing to me, so some
of the formatting is a bit shoddy.
Please feel free to make any cosmetic improvements that you think
would be good.
On Dec 21, 2006, at 12:2
On Dec 20, 2006, at 4:21 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
FTR, I've been tracking the various OpenJPA integrations at http://
cwiki.apache.org/openjpa/powered-by.html . I've just updated it
with Geronimo, Ode, and OpenEJB.
Cool, thanks! It's neat to see the OpenEJB logo on somebody else's
On Oct 27, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
When can Geronimo ship an upgrade to JTA 1.1 that we can use and
compile with 1.3?
These are "goodness" that I think OpenJPA can use.
Ok, so it's taken me a while to get this done, but I've got our JTA
1.1 and JPA specs ready for relea
