Hi,
According to the discussion at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-123, it looks like
TestNG's concept of test groups could let us easily create tests that
are expected to fail, and exclude them from test runs until the
corresponding behavior is fixed / feature is implemented. What
My only concern is IDE support and specifically the IDE I use
intellij. Does this work as a test case type in IntelliJ and Eclipse?
If so, I don't really care which framework we use.
-dain
On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
Hi,
According to the discussion at
I see that they have a plugin for Eclipse, but I haven't tried it yet. It
doesn't look like it supports IntelliJ. On the surface, the conversion and
usage looks doable and would satisfy the failed testcase problem.
My question is whether it's worth the effort. If we have a testcase that
has
On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:39 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
I see that they have a plugin for Eclipse, but I haven't tried it
yet. It
doesn't look like it supports IntelliJ. On the surface, the
conversion and
usage looks doable and would satisfy the failed testcase problem.
We can exclude tests
, February 01, 2007 12:21 PM
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to TestNG?
I am using TestNG with IntelliJ. See
http://testng.org/doc/idea.html (I
don't use OpenJPA yet, but I plan to on a personal project so
I'm reading
the list). My project uses Apache MINA
Here's a good article comparing TestNG with JUnit:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-cq08296/
IMO, the groups feature is nice, but isn't necessarily sufficient to
justify a lot of effort porting over tests (since we could always
just check a system property before
For what it's worth Marc is right. I've used testng via the surefire plugin
as a front end to running jUnit tests. In my case I just tried to get them
to run in parallel, but we should be able to use groups in the same manner.
On 2/1/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a
