Hi Marc,
On Nov 12, 2006, at 2:17 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
Craig-
On Nov 12, 2006, at 2:06 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Marc,
Please read this regarding votes. http://www.apache.org/foundation/
voting.html#ReleaseVotes
Votes on whether a package is ready to be released follow a fo
Craig-
On Nov 12, 2006, at 2:06 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Marc,
Please read this regarding votes. http://www.apache.org/foundation/
voting.html#ReleaseVotes
Votes on whether a package is ready to be released follow a format
similar to majority approval -- except that the decision is
Hi Marc,
Please read this regarding votes. http://www.apache.org/foundation/
voting.html#ReleaseVotes
Votes on whether a package is ready to be released follow a format
similar to majority approval -- except that the decision is
officially determined solely by whether at least three +1 vo
-1 from Eddie, so the vote fails (since I believe it constitutes a
veto).
I'll re-start the vote with the fixed release files shortly.
On Nov 12, 2006, at 7:03 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
Marc--
Sounds good -- nice turnaround time. :) I agree that it's fine to
defer some of these.
In NO
