ease immediately return
this
by email and then delete it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 7:55 PM
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: org.apache.openjpa.persistence.test.PersistenceTestCase
There's a bu
ache.org
Subject: Re: org.apache.openjpa.persistence.test.PersistenceTestCase
There's a bunch of stuff that we use in the JDO base test
class. I'll
take a look and see what might be useful for us here.
Which class should we use as the real base class? Which project does
it belong in?
d then delete it.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 7:55 PM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: org.apache.openjpa.persistence.test.PersistenceTestCase
>
> There's a bunch
There's a bunch of stuff that we use in the JDO base test class. I'll
take a look and see what might be useful for us here.
Which class should we use as the real base class? Which project does
it belong in?
Craig
On Mar 6, 2007, at 7:50 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
Patrick-
FYI, I had
Patrick-
FYI, I had also put some of that sort of logic in the
org.apache.openjpa.persistence.test.SingleEMTest base test case.
We might want to consider merging duplicate functionality at some point.
On Mar 6, 2007, at 6:09 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
Hi,
In implementing a new test case
Hi,
In implementing a new test case for OPENJPA-121, I decided to stop
copying-and-pasting the setUp() from other test cases, and instead
create a new PersistenceTestCase base class.
Based on our experience over the last few years, there are a bunch of
things that would be useful in such a class.
