[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-132) java.lang.NoSuchMethodError for entity with ID of type java.sql.Date

2007-02-28 Thread Patrick Linskey (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Patrick Linskey updated OPENJPA-132:


Fix Version/s: 0.9.7

 java.lang.NoSuchMethodError for entity with ID of type java.sql.Date
 

 Key: OPENJPA-132
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-132
 Project: OpenJPA
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: kernel
Reporter: Michael Dick
 Fix For: 0.9.7


 Opening JIRA report to track the following problem (posted to development 
 forum 
 http://www.nabble.com/Exception-when-using-java.sql.Date-as-an-id-tf3189597.html)
  
 I'm getting the following exception when I try to fetch an entity with a 
 java.sql.Date as the id :
 java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 
 org.apache.openjpa.util.DateId.getId()Ljava/sql/Date;
 at mikedd.entities.SqlDatePK.pcCopyKeyFieldsFromObjectId (SqlDatePK.java)
 at mikedd.entities.SqlDatePK.pcNewInstance(SqlDatePK.java)
 at org.apache.openjpa.enhance.PCRegistry.newInstance(PCRegistry.java:118)
 at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.StateManagerImpl.initialize 
 (StateManagerImpl.java:247)
 at 
 org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.initializeState(JDBCStoreManager.java:327)
 at 
 org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.initialize(JDBCStoreManager.java:252)
 at 
 org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingStoreManager.initialize(DelegatingStoreManager.java:108)
 at 
 org.apache.openjpa.kernel.ROPStoreManager.initialize(ROPStoreManager.java:54)
 at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.initialize (BrokerImpl.java:868)
 at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.find(BrokerImpl.java:826)
 at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.find(BrokerImpl.java:743)
 at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingBroker.find 
 (DelegatingBroker.java:169)
 at 
 org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityManagerImpl.find(EntityManagerImpl.java:346)
 at mikedd.tests.TestSqlDateId.testFindAfterClear(TestSqlDateId.java:25)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0 (Native Method)
 at 
 sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at 
 sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Method.java:585)
 at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
 . . .
 It's coming from the generated bytecode which expects there to be a getId 
 method that returns the same type of the Id, however java.sql.Date is using 
 the same ID class as java.util.Date. Do we need a separate class for 
 java.sql.Date? 
 Responses from Patrick and Craig follow. The consensus so far is to provide 
 ID separate classes for java.sql.Date and java.util.Date. 
 It looks like we either need a separate type for java.sql.Date (and
 presumably java.sql.Timestamp), or we need to change the logic to accept
 a getId() method that returns a type that is assignable from the id
 field's type.
 -Patrick
 It's probably cleaner if we have separate classes for the different
 types. That is, have the getId method in the new
 org.apache.openjpa.util.SQLDateId return the proper type
 (java.sql.Date). After all, java.sql.{Date, Time, Timestamp} are not
 really the same as java.util.Date.
 -Craig
 FTR, I think that I prefer separate classes as well; it's clearer, and
 avoids any ambiguity with other subclasses in the future.
 -Patrick

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (OPENJPA-132) java.lang.NoSuchMethodError for entity with ID of type java.sql.Date

2007-02-28 Thread Patrick Linskey (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Patrick Linskey updated OPENJPA-132:


Priority: Minor  (was: Major)

 java.lang.NoSuchMethodError for entity with ID of type java.sql.Date
 

 Key: OPENJPA-132
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-132
 Project: OpenJPA
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: kernel
Reporter: Michael Dick
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 0.9.7


 Opening JIRA report to track the following problem (posted to development 
 forum 
 http://www.nabble.com/Exception-when-using-java.sql.Date-as-an-id-tf3189597.html)
  
 I'm getting the following exception when I try to fetch an entity with a 
 java.sql.Date as the id :
 java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 
 org.apache.openjpa.util.DateId.getId()Ljava/sql/Date;
 at mikedd.entities.SqlDatePK.pcCopyKeyFieldsFromObjectId (SqlDatePK.java)
 at mikedd.entities.SqlDatePK.pcNewInstance(SqlDatePK.java)
 at org.apache.openjpa.enhance.PCRegistry.newInstance(PCRegistry.java:118)
 at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.StateManagerImpl.initialize 
 (StateManagerImpl.java:247)
 at 
 org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.initializeState(JDBCStoreManager.java:327)
 at 
 org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.initialize(JDBCStoreManager.java:252)
 at 
 org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingStoreManager.initialize(DelegatingStoreManager.java:108)
 at 
 org.apache.openjpa.kernel.ROPStoreManager.initialize(ROPStoreManager.java:54)
 at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.initialize (BrokerImpl.java:868)
 at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.find(BrokerImpl.java:826)
 at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.find(BrokerImpl.java:743)
 at org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingBroker.find 
 (DelegatingBroker.java:169)
 at 
 org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityManagerImpl.find(EntityManagerImpl.java:346)
 at mikedd.tests.TestSqlDateId.testFindAfterClear(TestSqlDateId.java:25)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0 (Native Method)
 at 
 sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at 
 sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke (Method.java:585)
 at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
 . . .
 It's coming from the generated bytecode which expects there to be a getId 
 method that returns the same type of the Id, however java.sql.Date is using 
 the same ID class as java.util.Date. Do we need a separate class for 
 java.sql.Date? 
 Responses from Patrick and Craig follow. The consensus so far is to provide 
 ID separate classes for java.sql.Date and java.util.Date. 
 It looks like we either need a separate type for java.sql.Date (and
 presumably java.sql.Timestamp), or we need to change the logic to accept
 a getId() method that returns a type that is assignable from the id
 field's type.
 -Patrick
 It's probably cleaner if we have separate classes for the different
 types. That is, have the getId method in the new
 org.apache.openjpa.util.SQLDateId return the proper type
 (java.sql.Date). After all, java.sql.{Date, Time, Timestamp} are not
 really the same as java.util.Date.
 -Craig
 FTR, I think that I prefer separate classes as well; it's clearer, and
 avoids any ambiguity with other subclasses in the future.
 -Patrick

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.