I agree with the sentiment expressed -- OpenJPA has done a good job
working together on a good code base with a growing, diverse group of
contributors. I'm proud of the work that's been done here.
These days, the Board is wary of umbrella projects and is more
comfortable with pushing smaller
In terms of graduation, if we go the top-level route, I'd like to
propose Craig as the PMC chair. I think that he'd be a good fit since
he's quite active in the OpenJPA community, and also has a good deal of
knowledge about and experience within Apache. I think that he would do a
great job of
Patrick,
On 4/27/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In terms of graduation, if we go the top-level route, I'd like to
propose Craig as the PMC chair.
I second that vote, if you are not interested. Craig has gotten us out of
Apache hot water a few times with his background on
27, 2007 1:23 PM
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] OpenJPA Graduation
Patrick,
On 4/27/07, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In terms of graduation, if we go the top-level route, I'd like to
propose Craig as the PMC chair.
I second that vote
I'm personally rather neutral on whether OpenJPA should be a TLP vs.
a sub-project. TLP seems like it allows us more flexibility and
independence, so by default I would lean towards being a TLP.
However, I do notice that the DB TLP already holds other similar
projects (Torque, OJB, and
On Apr 23, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
I'm personally rather neutral on whether OpenJPA should be a TLP
vs. a sub-project. TLP seems like it allows us more flexibility and
independence, so by default I would lean towards being a TLP.
That's my main concern as well.
]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 4:35 PM
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] OpenJPA Graduation
On Apr 23, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
I'm personally rather neutral on whether OpenJPA should be
a TLP vs. a
sub-project. TLP seems like it allows
