RE: initial commit

2006-05-30 Thread Patrick Linskey
: initial commit I've been told that if you're already using maven 1, and it works, there's not much value in switching, but if you're starting a new project, you might as well use maven 2. by the maven mavens. So I'd probably be in favor of maven 2 since we're starting from scratch

Re: initial commit

2006-05-30 Thread Craig L Russell
Maven is pretty good at building, testing, and packaging for release without a lot of manual intervention. I think we would need to create a separate maven goal to repackage the jars into the final jar distribution but maven allows you do create pre- and post-goals to do just what you need

RE: initial commit

2006-05-30 Thread Patrick Linskey
Would it be ok to build three different jar files based on whether the target was 1.3, 1.4, or 1.5? Packaging the different jar files into one could be a post-build exercise. Or a specific build target that combined the three jar files. How is the source code structured today?

Re: initial commit

2006-05-16 Thread Craig L Russell
I've been told that if you're already using maven 1, and it works, there's not much value in switching, but if you're starting a new project, you might as well use maven 2. by the maven mavens. So I'd probably be in favor of maven 2 since we're starting from scratch. The question has