Re: Eol-style

2007-02-02 Thread Eddie O'Neil
Yeah, this is what we do in Beehive as well. My suggestion would be to document the SVN configuration settings for OpenJPA committers in something like DEVELOPING.txt at the top-level of the project. Over time as new committers come on board, just make sure that they're aware of this and use it

Re: svn commit: r502374 - in /incubator/openjpa/trunk: openjpa-jdbc/src/main/resources/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/ant/antlib.xml openjpa-kernel/src/main/resources/org/apache/openjpa/ant/antlib.xml

2007-02-02 Thread Marc Prud'hommeaux
I went ahead and changed it to "enhance", just because I think it is a little more descriptive than "openjpac". If anyone has any strong feelings, I am open to switching it back, or changing it to something else... On Feb 1, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: openjpac looks like "

[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-119) EntityManager.clear() should not implicitly invoke the flush operation

2007-02-02 Thread Kevin Sutter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469868 ] Kevin Sutter commented on OPENJPA-119: -- Here's what I decided to do... I introduced a new boolean on the deta

[jira] Resolved: (OPENJPA-119) EntityManager.clear() should not implicitly invoke the flush operation

2007-02-02 Thread Kevin Sutter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevin Sutter resolved OPENJPA-119. -- Resolution: Fixed Resolved. > EntityManager.clear() should not implicitly invoke the flush op

RE: svn commit: r502751 - in /incubator/openjpa/trunk: openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/kernel/ openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/simple/ openjpa-per

2007-02-02 Thread Patrick Linskey
Hi, To date, almost all of the OpenJPA code uses single-line-style comments inside method blocks, instead of multi-line comments. I prefer sticking with this convention; my excuse is that it makes it easier to comment out blocks of code during debugging, since you can use /*-style comments when de

Re: svn commit: r502751 - in /incubator/openjpa/trunk: openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/kernel/ openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/simple/ openjpa-per

2007-02-02 Thread Kevin Sutter
I'm okay with the single line convention. I'm flexible. I'll change these two comment blocks if that's the direction we want to go. On 2/2/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, To date, almost all of the OpenJPA code uses single-line-style comments inside method blocks, instead

Re: svn commit: r502751 - in /incubator/openjpa/trunk: openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/kernel/ openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/simple/ openjpa-per

2007-02-02 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
interesting. I always did it the other way - use /* */ in code, and // for commenting out blocks :) On Feb 2, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote: Hi, To date, almost all of the OpenJPA code uses single-line-style comments inside method blocks, instead of multi-line comments. I prefer

Re: svn commit: r502751 - in /incubator/openjpa/trunk: openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/kernel/ openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/simple/ openjpa-per

2007-02-02 Thread Kevin Sutter
For some reason, my reply seems to have gotten lost... I don't care which way we do it. I'm flexible. If we decide to go with the single line comments, then I'll change the two blocks that Patrick pointed out in the original note. P.S. I kind of side with Geir on this. I just use Eclipse to

Re: svn commit: r502751 - in /incubator/openjpa/trunk: openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/kernel/ openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/simple/ openjpa-per

2007-02-02 Thread Craig L Russell
Well, I don't use the block comment feature, and sometimes I even have to use vi to comment out blocks. So I guess I'd be happier with single-line comments a la +// Check for null here because _brokers is a weak reference collection if ((broker != null) &&

OpenJPA release 0.9.6 on Maven repo?

2007-02-02 Thread Rahul Thakur
Hi, Is version 0.9.6 available on a Maven repo. I couldn't find it anywhere. I am wanting to prepare a release for OpenJPA Maven plugin. Cheers, Rahul

Re: OpenJPA release 0.9.6 on Maven repo?

2007-02-02 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Due to Apache Incubator policy the archives are only available via the separate incubator repo at apache. http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository For example, the openjpa-all 0.9.6 jar is located here: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/ openjpa/