Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?

[Kevin Sutter]

Thanks, Patrick.  I hadn't even realized that we had that specified in the
pom.xml.  Learn something new everyday with this project...  :-)

Kevin

On 11/10/06, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I just removed the openjpa-kernel-4 module (moved its contents to
openjpa-kernel) and change the poms to use JDK1.4 as the source and
target instead of 1.3.

-Patrick

--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.

___
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.

 -Original Message-
 From: Kevin Sutter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 7:28 AM
 To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
 Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?

 Although we have started to process as if JDK 1.3 is no
 longer supported, I
 recently realized that I never published the results of the vote...

 +14 votes (including my and Patrick's implicit votes)
 +/- 0 1 vote
 -1 0 votes

 Thus, OpenJPA will only focus on support of JDK 1.4 and
 beyond.  Thanks.

 Kevin

 On 10/25/06, Kevin Sutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi,
  A recent discussion concerning a patch for OPENJPA-63
 (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63
 
 
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments
 #action_1214)
  has prompted a question that Patrick and I felt should be
 brought out into a
  public discussion.  It turns out that the patch posted for
 this report is
  using a method on DelegatingDatabaseMetaData that was
 introduced in JDK
  1.4.  Patrick's original concern is that we should continue
 to support JDK
  1.3.  Since JDK 1.3 has started it's EOL campaign, I'm wondering how
  important it is to continue to support JDK 1.3.  My thought (and now
  Patrick's) is that we should focus on JDK 1.4 and above.
 Here's your
  chance to vote...
 
  Statement:  OpenJPA should support JDK 1.4 and beyond.  There is no
  requirement to support the older JDK 1.3 environment.
 
  +1 Agree. JDK 1.4 and beyond
  -1  Disagree.  We need to support JDK 1.3.
  +/- 0  Neutral.  Do whatever.
 
  Thanks,
  Kevin
 

[VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?

[Kevin Sutter]

Hi,
A recent discussion concerning a patch for OPENJPA-63 (
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments#action_1214)
has prompted a question that Patrick and I felt should be brought out into a
public discussion.  It turns out that the patch posted for this report is
using a method on DelegatingDatabaseMetaData that was introduced in JDK 1.4.
Patrick's original concern is that we should continue to support JDK 1.3.
Since JDK 1.3 has started it's EOL campaign, I'm wondering how important it
is to continue to support JDK 1.3.  My thought (and now Patrick's) is that
we should focus on JDK 1.4 and above.  Here's your chance to vote...

Statement:  OpenJPA should support JDK 1.4 and beyond.  There is no
requirement to support the older JDK 1.3 environment.

+1 Agree. JDK 1.4 and beyond
-1  Disagree.  We need to support JDK 1.3.
+/- 0  Neutral.  Do whatever.

Thanks,
Kevin

Re: [VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required?

[Abe White]

+/- 0  Neutral.  Do whatever.



___
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.