[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12470294
]
Craig Russell commented on OPENJPA-117:
---
Maybe this case would best be handled by having the TransactionListen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469093
]
Pinaki Poddar commented on OPENJPA-117:
---
> Adding listeners should generally either be done as an initializati
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Januar 2007 21:16
An: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-117) Collection of
TransactionListeners registered to a Broker should be available as
unmodifiable collection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-117
> From: Thierling, Marcus (Salt Solutions)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 1:22 AM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: AW: [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-117) Collection of
> TransactionListeners registered to a Broker should be
> avail
---Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Patrick Linskey (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Januar 2007 19:38
An: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: [jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-117) Collection of
TransactionListeners registered to a Broker should be available as
unmo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468770
]
Abe White commented on OPENJPA-117:
---
I don't see why listeners are some special case that require more isolation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468735
]
Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-117:
-
The problem is that this lets party A get what party B set. So if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468734
]
Abe White commented on OPENJPA-117:
---
I don't think we should encourage use of user objects for tracking state we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468724
]
Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-117:
-
So an alternate approach that would not expose any additional int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468719
]
Pinaki Poddar commented on OPENJPA-117:
---
The use case is the code that intends to register a listener but gets
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12468711
]
Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-117:
-
What's the use case for this? If someone were to write code that
11 matches
Mail list logo