[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491310
]
Abe White commented on OPENJPA-219:
---
1. Yes, clearly we'd use our org.apache.openjpa.lib.util.concurrent.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491316
]
Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-219:
-
another way to approach this would be not to cache at all,
and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491458
]
Patrick Linskey commented on OPENJPA-219:
-
How does this compare to the leaky-patch version?
Reflection:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491470
]
Bret Weinraub commented on OPENJPA-219:
---
The no-leak version is cache v3 although that's a misnomer ; there's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491077
]
Bret Weinraub commented on OPENJPA-219:
---
I developed a patch version that cached both success and failure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12491078
]
Bret Weinraub commented on OPENJPA-219:
---
I will add the Cache v2 version here shortly.
Reflection: negative
