Re: Support of Collections of embedded and/or value types?
Hi Kevin, Yes, Collections and Maps of value types are a feature of JDO. They are rumored to be planned for a future revision of the JPA spec. They certainly are popular with users. Craig On Oct 25, 2006, at 7:01 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote: On 10/25/06, Abe White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought we (OpenJPA) supported the mapping of Collections of embedded types. OpenJPA never supported this. It was accidentally left in from the Kodo docs. Okay, was this a JDO feature? Does it still make sense to have OpenJPA support Collections and Maps of these types? Seems like a nice feature that would keep us consistent with Hibernate. Actually, maybe that would be a good exercise to see how OpenJPA matches up with Hibernate. Any Hibernate experts out there? Kevin Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Support of Collections of embedded and/or value types?
I thought we (OpenJPA) supported the mapping of Collections of embedded types. OpenJPA never supported this. It was accidentally left in from the Kodo docs. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
Re: Support of Collections of embedded and/or value types?
On 10/25/06, Abe White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought we (OpenJPA) supported the mapping of Collections of embedded types. OpenJPA never supported this. It was accidentally left in from the Kodo docs. Okay, was this a JDO feature? Does it still make sense to have OpenJPA support Collections and Maps of these types? Seems like a nice feature that would keep us consistent with Hibernate. Actually, maybe that would be a good exercise to see how OpenJPA matches up with Hibernate. Any Hibernate experts out there? Kevin