It appears as if only plus codes of length 10 or 11 are currently considered valid when entered in combination with a location name - while length 8 codes are correctly interpreted only without location name. For example:
*VALID*: G98H+G3, Berlin, Germany G98H+G3M, Berlin, Germany 9F4MG98H+ 9F4MG900+ 9F4M0000+ *INVALID* (plus code is ignored on maps, instead highlighting the whole Berlin area; leads to error message "We could not find: G98H+, BERLIN, GERMANY" on plus.codes) G98H+, Berlin, Germany In this example, as probably in most real life usecases, the whole of 9F4MG98H+ is located within Berlin, so it should be possible to shorten/recover the code: https://plus.codes/9F4MG98H+ Is this a bug, or is there any other reasoning for this behaviour? -- Public site: http://www.openlocationcode.com/ Github project: https://github.com/google/open-location-code Demo site: http://plus.codes/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-location-code" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-location-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to open-location-code@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/open-location-code. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-location-code/c69bd4f4-5d3f-49ca-b898-c99275b3b462%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
