com [mailto:open-scap-list-
> boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Raphael Sanchez Prudencio
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 7:39 AM
> To: Calvin Hartwell
> Cc: open-scap-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Open-scap] Windows Support
>
> Hello Calvin,
>
> On 02/09/2017
On 13/02/17 20:32, Lubell, Joshua (Fed) wrote:
I'm excited about the planned Windows support!
Hi, happy to hear that.
My particular interest relates to the SCAP Security Guide project.
Specifically, I would like to be able to experiment with the SSG source and
possibly contribute to SSG in t
com [mailto:open-scap-list-
> boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Raphael Sanchez Prudencio
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 7:39 AM
> To: Calvin Hartwell
> Cc: open-scap-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Open-scap] Windows Support
>
> Hello Calvin,
>
> On 02/09/2017
Hello Calvin,
On 02/09/2017 01:20 PM, Calvin Hartwell wrote:
> 1) Change probe architecture:
>
> Currently our probe system have individual binaries for each OVAL
> object, making it more complex and harder to maintain/debug due to IPC,
> the historical reasons to this is to be able to use tailor
1) Change probe architecture:
Currently our probe system have individual binaries for each OVAL
object, making it more complex and harder to maintain/debug due to IPC,
the historical reasons to this is to be able to use tailored SELinux
policies for each probe, which makes sense but sadly we never
- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Cerny"
> To: rspruden...@redhat.com, "open-scap-list"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 10:33:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [Open-scap] Windows Support
>
> Hi,
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: &
Hi,
- Original Message -
> From: "Raphael Sanchez Prudencio"
> To: open-scap-list@redhat.com
> Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 5:28:17 PM
> Subject: [Open-scap] Windows Support
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm planning some effort towards Windows support for OpenSCAP and I'd
> like to discuss a few to
