[Open64-devel] r3542 - trunk/osprey/be/com

2011-04-07 Thread svn
Author: shihui Date: 2011-04-07 22:01:04 -0400 (Thu, 07 Apr 2011) New Revision: 3542 Modified: trunk/osprey/be/com/constraint_graph.cxx Log: Fix bug747: Signal Floating point exception in phase Data Layout Exception happens in StInfo::applyModulus(UINT32 offset, UINT32 &start), modulus value

[Open64-devel] r3541 - trunk/osprey/be/opt

2011-04-07 Thread svn
Author: shihui Date: 2011-04-07 21:51:30 -0400 (Thu, 07 Apr 2011) New Revision: 3541 Modified: trunk/osprey/be/opt/opt_lmv.cxx Log: Fix bug754: Loop multi-version transformation insert a pre-condition BB before loop header BB. If loop header BB is if_BB's merge BB, need change if BB's merge

Re: [Open64-devel] r3539 - in trunk/osprey: be/cg be/cg/x8664 be/opt common/com

2011-04-07 Thread Berg, Michael
Michael Lai, sorry, read the checkins of others after this first one. Our internal process was different... m -Original Message- From: "C. Bergström" [mailto:cbergst...@pathscale.com] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 12:37 PM To: open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Open64-deve

Re: [Open64-devel] r3539 - in trunk/osprey: be/cg be/cg/x8664 be/opt common/com

2011-04-07 Thread C. Bergström
s...@open64.net wrote: > Author: mberg > Date: 2011-04-07 15:33:55 -0400 (Thu, 07 Apr 2011) > New Revision: 3539 > > Modified: >trunk/osprey/be/cg/cg.cxx >trunk/osprey/be/cg/cg_flags.cxx >trunk/osprey/be/cg/ebo.cxx >trunk/osprey/be/cg/x8664/cgtarget.cxx >trunk/osprey/be/cg/x8664

[Open64-devel] r3539 - in trunk/osprey: be/cg be/cg/x8664 be/opt common/com

2011-04-07 Thread svn
Author: mberg Date: 2011-04-07 15:33:55 -0400 (Thu, 07 Apr 2011) New Revision: 3539 Modified: trunk/osprey/be/cg/cg.cxx trunk/osprey/be/cg/cg_flags.cxx trunk/osprey/be/cg/ebo.cxx trunk/osprey/be/cg/x8664/cgtarget.cxx trunk/osprey/be/cg/x8664/ebo_special.cxx trunk/osprey/be/cg/x86

[Open64-devel] r3538 - trunk/osprey/be/opt

2011-04-07 Thread svn
Author: minz Date: 2011-04-07 13:28:58 -0400 (Thu, 07 Apr 2011) New Revision: 3538 Modified: trunk/osprey/be/opt/opt_ssa.cxx Log: Bug Fix: bug761 Fixing a problem in Resurrect_chi - it uses chi's result (du) to set_opnd, which causes the non-zero version use before def (assertion in verifyin

Re: [Open64-devel] code review request for AMD 4.2.5 changes

2011-04-07 Thread Jian-Xin Lai
This patch looks fine to me. Please go ahead and commit it. 2011/4/6 Berg, Michael > As requested, in sequence, and I also included the full patch. It is not > so much these two that are co-dependent, but the sequence of patches that > will follow which will need to be done in order. > > > > m

Re: [Open64-devel] code review request bug fix 747

2011-04-07 Thread Jian-Xin Lai
This patch looks fine to me. 2011/4/6 Hui Shi > update patch. space the parentheses. > > > Index: osprey/be/com/constraint_graph.cxx > === > --- osprey/be/com/constraint_graph.cxx (revision 3534) > +++ osprey/be/com/constraint_grap

Re: [Open64-devel] Code review request for bug#754, Assertion emit WHIRL tree.

2011-04-07 Thread Jian-Xin Lai
This patch looks fine to me. Please go ahead and commit it. 2011/4/2 Hui Shi > Can gatekeeper help review this fix? > > loop multi-version maintain CFG has bug, cause assertion when emit WHIRL > tree. > > https://bugs.open64.net/show_bug.cgi?id=754 > > Loop multi-version transformation insert a

Re: [Open64-devel] Fix for bug 758 -Wuninitialized not handled properly in Fortran compilations

2011-04-07 Thread Jian-Xin Lai
This patch looks fine. 2011/4/2 Gilmore, Doug > I attached the test and patch that were already attached to the bug. > > The change was ported from the PSC 3.3 beta. > > Could a gatekeeper review/approve this change when he or she has a chance? > > Thanks, > > Doug > > >

Re: [Open64-devel] Review request: fix for LNO bug 755

2011-04-07 Thread Jian-Xin Lai
These code should come from original SGI MIPSpro compiler. There is no change log on these lines in open64.net. 2011/4/1 Sun Chan > strange that the original code turned off simplifier first and tries > to do that locally. Does anyone know why? These kind of thing is best > done in the simplifie

Re: [Open64-devel] Fwd: code review for fix of a bug: -m32 -march=athlon -O0 compiler assertion with complex*16

2011-04-07 Thread Jian-Xin Lai
This patch looks fine to me. 2011/3/30 Yiran Wang > Sorry for forgetting to attached the patch in previous message. > > Index: osprey/common/com/wn_simp_code.h > === > --- osprey/common/com/wn_simp_code.h(revision 1185) > +++ os

Re: [Open64-devel] Review request for SL changes merge

2011-04-07 Thread Gang Yu
Hi David, Thank you very much. On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:09 PM, David Coakley wrote: > Hi Gang, > > I looked at the build_system, driver, and isa_subset_sl patches. Here > are my comments: > > 1. In the new file INSTALL.cross.sl, please use the current license > template instead of the old