Re: [Open64-devel] Review request for open64 ppc native compiler

2012-09-30 Thread David Coakley
Ok, that looks better. I don't think the following change is needed, though: @@ -318,8 +318,10 @@ $(NATIVE_BUILD_DIR)/ir_tools/ir_b2a ir_b2a: libcomutil $(MAKE) -C $(NATIVE_BUILD_DIR)/ir_tools +ifneq ($(LIB_BUILD_ARCH), PPC32) $(NATIVE_BUILD_DIR)/crayf90/sgi/mfef95 mfef95: libcomutil l

Re: [Open64-devel] Review request for open64 ppc native compiler

2012-09-28 Thread Huan Luo
Thanks very much for the help. IPA is not supported on ppc native. And I made some adjustments on "arith" according to your suggestion. Everything looks fine after these new changes. A new patch is attached. Thanks again for your review. -- Best wishes. Huan Luo At 2012-09-27 11:53:38,"Da

Re: [Open64-devel] Review request for open64 ppc native compiler

2012-09-26 Thread David Coakley
Just to follow up, I did some testing and 'arith' can be safely excluded when Fortran is not supported. Here is my suggested change to handle that part: Index: Makefile.in === --- Makefile.in (revision 4030) +++ Makefile.in (working

Re: [Open64-devel] Review request for open64 ppc native compiler

2012-09-22 Thread David Coakley
Hello, I looked at the changes. I'm a bit confused by the exclusion of ld-new in Makefile.in: ifneq ($(LIB_BUILD_ARCH), PPC32) BASIC_COMPONENTS += \ $(NATIVE_BUILD_DIR_LD)/ld/ld-new endif Do you support IPA for this configuration? If not, then you should define BUILD_SK

[Open64-devel] Review request for open64 ppc native compiler

2012-09-19 Thread Huan Luo
Hi, In this patch, we adopt the configure-based build system for ppc native. The build and install process of ppc native compiler is slightly different from that of x86-ppc cross compiler, which is currently available in the trunk. We made a few adjustments so that ppc native can be successfully