oid deleting stores
> that appear dead but actually not since the variable is passed by reference
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 4:52 PM
> To: Ye, Mei
> Cc: open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subj
-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] code review: bug fixes for proactive/aggressive
loop fusions
I understand it is simpler for testing purposes. For later on bug
triage and identification, it would be better if checkins are done one
item at a time (except for hugh source
I understand it is simpler for testing purposes. For later on bug
triage and identification, it would be better if checkins are done one
item at a time (except for hugh source changes). Is it possible to
separate the changes by item?
Sun
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Ye, Mei wrote:
> This patc
This patch contains several bug fixes for proactive/aggressive loop fusions.
- Fix successor list in "Do_tail_duplication".
- Fix several compilation seg faults for several corner cases like avoid using
a deleted loop WHIRL;
skip loops that are not flagged LOOP_PRE_DO for normalization in proac
