If the user doesn't initialize the field, its value should be 0 by default.
In that case, it's safe to place the data into .bss section.
2011/3/26 Sun Chan
> but you are bypassing the FLD
> Sun
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Jian-Xin Lai wrote:
> > Yes. The function Is_Aggregate_Init_Zero
Hi,
I updated the patch. In general, the GCC tree for struct initialization
contains two chains. One is for field information (name, type, size, etc)
and the other is for the initial value. For example:
struct A { int f1; int f2; };
struct B { struct A f3; int f4; };
struct B b = {1, 2, 3};
The GC
but you are bypassing the FLD
Sun
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Jian-Xin Lai wrote:
> Yes. The function Is_Aggregate_Init_Zero_Struct() will call
> Is_Aggregate_Init_Zero() if meet a nested data structure (nested struct or
> array).
>
> 2011/3/26 Sun Chan
>>
>> will your fix handle nested str
Yes. The function Is_Aggregate_Init_Zero_Struct() will call
Is_Aggregate_Init_Zero() if meet a nested data structure (nested struct or
array).
2011/3/26 Sun Chan
> will your fix handle nested structs correctly?
> Sun
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Jian-Xin Lai wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could
will your fix handle nested structs correctly?
Sun
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Jian-Xin Lai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could a gate keeper review the patch for #746?
> For the first case, the TY for c4 is:
> [54]: c4 : (f: 0x1800 return_in_mem content_seen) size 4 M:
> STRUCT
>
